Rudyard Kipling: The Controversial Voice of Empire

Rudyard Kipling: The Controversial Voice of Empire

English Literature

Sharing is caring!

“He’s one of the most famous authors in British literary history, but for some, Rudyard Kipling’s name is synonymous with the voice of empire—an empire that left a complex legacy of both grandeur and devastation.”

Rudyard Kipling, the renowned British author, poet, and storyteller, is best known for works like The Jungle Book and Kim, which are cherished by readers worldwide. However, Kipling’s legacy is far from simple or universally celebrated. In many ways, he was the quintessential voice of the British Empire, a writer who both championed and glorified imperialism through his words.

His controversial views, which celebrated British colonial dominance, have sparked debates for over a century. Yet, his immense influence on English literature, his unique storytelling style, and his portrayal of British imperialism cannot be ignored.

In this post, we’ll delve into Kipling’s life, his connection to the British Empire, the controversy surrounding his views on race and imperialism, and how his works continue to challenge readers and critics today.

Early Life and Influences

Rudyard Kipling was born on December 30, 1865, in Bombay (now Mumbai), India, into a British family with deep ties to the British Empire. His father, John Lockwood Kipling, was a prominent artist and curator at the Victoria and Albert Museum in Bombay, while his mother, Alice, was a former schoolteacher. The Kipling family’s life in India deeply shaped Rudyard’s early experiences.

Kipling was exposed to the sights, sounds, and cultures of India from a young age. However, in 1871, when Kipling was just five years old, he and his sister were sent back to England for their education.

The separation from his parents caused Kipling immense pain and would later inform much of his writing, particularly in works like The Jungle Book where the theme of exile and the longing for home plays a significant role.

Despite being raised in England, Kipling’s strong connection to India remained central to his identity. His Indian childhood, though colored by the imperial structures around him, was formative in shaping the writer he would become.

This dual experience of India and England created a lens through which Kipling viewed the world, often through the imperialistic worldview that was common in British society during the late 19th century.

Kipling and Imperialism

Kipling’s most famous works are often intertwined with the British Empire. From his early poetry to his short stories, Kipling’s works extolled the virtues of empire, depicting British colonial rule as a civilizing force for the native populations. His 1899 poem The White Man’s Burden is perhaps the most famous example of this.

The White Man’s Burden was written at a time when the United States was becoming more involved in imperialistic activities, particularly in the Philippines after the Spanish-American War. The poem urged Americans to take on the “burden” of empire, encouraging them to civilize the “savage” lands and people they conquered. Kipling’s portrayal of imperialism as a self-sacrificial duty, an obligation of the “civilized” nations to guide and govern the “uncivilized” world, was not just controversial—it was deeply problematic.

The phrase “The White Man’s Burden” has since become a symbol of colonialist rhetoric and is often used to highlight the inherent racism and paternalism of imperial thought. While Kipling may have believed he was advocating for a noble cause, his words echoed the dominant ideology of the time: the belief in the superiority of Western civilization and the justification of colonialism as a benevolent enterprise.

This mindset can also be seen in Kipling’s Kim, which tells the story of a young British boy born in India and caught between two cultures. While Kim is often praised for its vivid portrayal of India and its intricate narrative, it also reflects the imperial worldview that sees India as a land to be explored and exploited by British characters. The portrayal of native Indians in his works is often stereotypical and colonial in nature, reinforcing the idea of British superiority over the “primitive” societies they governed.

Kipling’s Attitudes Toward Race and Empire

One of the most contentious aspects of Kipling’s legacy is his racial views. In many of his works, Kipling presents a vision of a hierarchical world where the British Empire is at the top, with other races beneath it. His portrayal of indigenous peoples in India, Africa, and other colonized regions reflects the prejudices and assumptions of the time.

In his short stories, for example, Kipling often describes non-European characters as “primitive,” “superstitious,” or “barbaric.” While some of his characters, like Mowgli in The Jungle Book, are sympathetic figures who speak to the potential for cross-cultural understanding, many others fall into the trap of exoticism, portraying indigenous cultures as inferior or in need of Western guidance.

This “civilizing” mindset reflects the colonial mindset of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which saw the British Empire as the natural ruler of the world and other cultures as backward or uncivilized.

In addition, Kipling’s personal attitudes toward race are evident in his speeches and writings. He was a vocal supporter of British imperialism and defended the Empire’s actions in places like India, Africa, and South Africa. His famous “Boots” poem, written during the Boer War, glorifies the British soldiers’ role in maintaining imperial order, ignoring the complex realities of colonial violence and oppression.

While Kipling’s works are undeniably insightful in many ways, they also serve as a window into the imperialistic mindset of the era. This makes it difficult for modern readers to separate his literary genius from the deeply problematic ideas he espoused about race and empire.

Kipling’s Legacy: A Divisive Figure

Rudyard Kipling’s legacy remains a source of division among scholars, readers, and critics. On one hand, his contributions to English literature are immeasurable. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1907, the first English-language author to receive the prestigious honor. His storytelling prowess, particularly in works like The Jungle Book, Kim, and his collection of short stories, has earned him a lasting place in the literary canon.

Yet, on the other hand, his imperialist views, particularly his glorification of colonialism and his racial stereotypes, have led to widespread criticism.

In recent years, Kipling’s works have been reassessed, with some even suggesting that his influence has been overstated in light of his controversial ideas. However, dismissing Kipling entirely would overlook the complexities of his writing and the historical context in which he wrote.

Many critics argue that Kipling’s works should be read with an awareness of their imperialist context. They argue that his works provide valuable insight into the mentality of the time, even if that mentality is deeply flawed by modern standards.

Indeed, by reading Kipling critically, we can better understand the ways in which literature reflects and perpetuates the ideologies of the time.

Some also suggest that Kipling’s works need to be understood as part of a broader narrative of imperialism and resistance.

While Kipling supported British imperialism, his works also reflect the struggles of individuals caught in the gears of empire, whether they be the colonizers or the colonized. His characters often grapple with issues of identity, belonging, and power, making his works rich subjects for discussion and analysis.

Conclusion: The Complexity of Kipling’s Voice

Rudyard Kipling’s place in history is undeniably complex. On one hand, he was a master storyteller whose works have inspired generations of readers. On the other hand, his views on empire, race, and colonialism remain controversial and problematic.

Kipling’s works offer us a glimpse into the mindset of an imperialist society, and they force us to confront the dark realities of colonialism, even as they celebrate the triumphs of the British Empire.

To appreciate Kipling fully is to engage with both the brilliance of his storytelling and the troubling aspects of his views. While we may not agree with his politics, we cannot ignore the lasting impact of his work.

Kipling’s voice, as controversial as it may be, remains an essential part of the conversation about empire, race, and literature. Whether we see him as a champion of empire or a product of it, his legacy is one that continues to provoke debate and reflection.

In the end, Kipling’s writing challenges us to reckon with the complexities of history and the ways in which literature shapes our understanding of the world. His legacy, both celebrated and condemned, is a powerful reminder of the ways in which art and politics are forever intertwined.

More topics:

Sharing is caring!

Related Posts